Parabolic SAR prediction accuracy on the 15 minute chart, compared across every instrument.
| Instrument | Confidence | Position | Directional |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIT | 57.1% | 51.7% | 83.3% |
| CL | 54.3% | 53.5% | 98.0% |
| GC | 54.2% | 54.7% | 98.0% |
| M6E | 44.3% | 56.6% | 98.0% |
| MBT | 53.1% | 46.8% | 80.0% |
| MCL | 54.6% | 59.1% | 98.0% |
| MET | 63.5% | 72.1% | 80.0% |
| MGC | 53.9% | 47.8% | 98.0% |
| MNG | 50.8% | 73.6% | 98.0% |
| NG | 54.4% | 53.1% | 98.0% |
| RTY | 39.3% | 62.5% | 98.0% |
| YM | 41.4% | 57.2% | 98.0% |
| ZN | 51.5% | 64.1% | 98.0% |
On directional accuracy the strongest of these is CL at 98.0%. Instruments differ in how cleanly they trend, so the same reading is not equally informative on all of them.

Directional accuracy is how often the projected direction proved right; position accuracy is how closely the projected path tracked what actually happened. Confidence is LiveCharts.AI's own read. The live prediction itself is generated inside the platform.
See the live predictions — 7 day free trialSee live predictions on LiveCharts.AI →